New-onset retroperitoneal fibrosis following COVID-19 mRNA vaccination: Coincidental or vaccine-induced phenomenon?

The Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA vaccine is a US Food and Drug Administration-approved coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine. Although it is reported to be safe and effective, immune dysregulation leading to autoimmunity has become an area of concern. Retroperitoneal fibrosis (RPF) is an immune-mediated fibroinflammatory disease characterized by the deposition of fibrous tissues, primarily around the abdominal aorta and iliac arteries. Herein, we report a case of RPF following Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA vaccination. To the best of our knowledge, there have been no published reports on RPF after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination. A 58-year-old woman with no history of autoimmune diseases presented with acute onset of epigastric pain 5 weeks after the second dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. She had been diagnosed with stage I breast cancer 9 years ago and was in complete remission on admission. Abdominal computed tomography showed preaortic soft-tissue infiltration around the origin of the superior mesenteric artery but no evidence of breast cancer recurrence. Considering the temporal relationship between current symptoms and vaccination and the absence of other possible causes, she was diagnosed with RPF secondary to Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine-induced autoimmunity. This case may raise awareness of the possibility of RPF development following COVID-19 mRNA vaccination.

Outbreak of Parainfluenza Virus During the COVID-19 Pandemic at a University Hospital in Korea.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of respiratory viral diseases including parainfluenza virus (PIV) infection has decreased noticeably due to strict quarantine measures during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the recent outbreak of PIV in children occurred unexpectedly and the distribution pattern showed prominent differences from before the COVID-19 pandemic. PIV is one of the major viral pathogens related to acute lower respiratory infection in young children and the elderly. Accordingly, the authors intended to identify the incidence and distribution pattern of PIV outbreaks and to contribute to public health by providing information on it. METHODS: This study was conducted retrospectively to investigate the incidence and distribution of PIV according to age group, gender, month, and season, and to analyze the co-infections from March 2020 to February 2022. The detection for respiratory microorganisms was performed through FilmArray assay. RESULTS: The overall incidence for at least one respiratory pathogen was 45.9% (665/1,450). PIV was not detected at all from March 2020 to August 2021. However, it was first detected in September 2021 and the rate in the month that followed, October, accounted for 60% (114/190) of the total PIV infections during the entire study period. It also accounted for 44.9% (190/423) of patients with respiratory pathogens from September 2021 to February 2022. It reached the highest proportion at 90.5% (114/126) in October 2021. As for the distribution according to the age groups, group 3 (58.4%) accounted for the highest percentage, followed by group 4 (21.1%). In the PIV positive cases, the overall rate of more than two respiratory pathogens was 32.6% (62/190). The most common pattern of co-infection was PIV3 with rhinovirus/enterovirus (67.7%), followed by PIV3 with adenovirus (8.1%) and PIV3 with rhinovirus/enterovirus and adenovirus (8.1%). CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic has brought about many changes in our daily lives. It has been confirmed that the seasonal distribution of PIV was distinctly different from before the COVID-19 pandemic. It is anticipated that this phenomenon will affect the incidence or distribution of other respiratory pathogens and viral epidemiology. Therefore, clinicians should pay attention to these changes in terms of public health.